Turing Machine
← All Turing Machine questions
Is the rulebook's card 25 example for 'none at all' correct?
The designer said the rulebook example is incorrect and the card's own examples are right.
- MasterDinadan · Community · 2022-08-08
- pacific · Designer · 2022-08-08
- pacific · Designer · 2022-08-14
- Turing Machine rulebook · Rulebook · Card 25
The rulebook's original 132 example for 'none at all' was wrong, because 3 and 2 are a consecutive pair. The designer confirmed the examples on the card itself, 135 and 531, are the correct ones, and the current rulebook lists those. For 'none at all', no two digits may be consecutive.